This is a questioning technique that seems so obvious when you understand it that you might find yourself using it every day for the rest of your teaching career.
What is the point of this discussion? Well, there are probably at least two things I want to happen:-
1) I gather the thoughts and ideas of my learners, helping me to assess their understanding and giving me a chance to probe and develop their thinking.
2) I want to make sure they are aware of and understand some specific, important points.
A funnel is wide at the top and tapers at the bottom. Using the questioning funnel means starting "at the top of the funnel" with at least one open* question, then narrowing down to draw out specific points with closed* questions later.
Responses to the open question at the start help me to assess understanding and gather ideas (e.g. "What did you notice about the poem / oil refinery / experiment / match etc.). It's very likely that the learners will spot something that I haven't thought of, and didn't intend to discuss. Great! The discussion will be all the richer for it. NB. Notice that the handle is at the top of the funnel, and it is this "open" section of the discussion that helps me get a "handle" on learners' understanding.
The specific point I wanted to draw out might well come out without prompting, but if not I can move down the funnel to more directed, but still open questions (e.g. "What can you tell me about the use of language in the second stanza?") and finally to more closed questions ("What was the intended impact of the use of assonance in line 5?" or "What is the name of the technique the poet uses here?")
Why does this technique make a difference? Well, everyone can have a go at responding to an open question (maximising potential participation in the discussion) whereas only learners who know the answer to a closed question can participate. More importantly, your learners will often respond to open questions in ways you did not anticipate, and frequently these responses will have value over and above your "intended" discussion.
Finally, always be wary of asking false open questions, where you ask what seems like an open question but are only looking for one response. This is effectively playing a game of "Guess what's in the teacher's head" and is a bit of a waste of time.
*For a very brief description of open and closed questions see this Wikipedia entry.
For goodness sake ! We all do this, daily, just none of us have decided to give it a pretentious nameReplyDelete
Lots maybe do but amongst us all are the less experienced and those of us who need to refesh our skills. Having a name to a technique helps us to remember it, this is accepted and common practice. I am surprised by such a negative comment it is not as though anyone is forcing you to do or read this. I have no connection to the site (I found it on a link) but applaud every attempt to help us teach more effectively.Delete
Anon #1 - really? Not only do you lack emotional intelligence, but you also fail to hold any type of understanding of adult learning principles.Delete
In addition, the author has not 'given' the tecnique a "pretentious" name - this is a well known communication method, used across many industries.
Anon 1: As an observer of teachers, not everyone who teaches understands this (effective questioning). I don't understand the hostility, but I've met many "professionals" who are stuck in a fixed mindset and look through their lens of perspective only. Not everyone is as accomplished as you are and as far as the name- the funnel questioning method is mainly used in business practice and has been around for decades. I think it's great that educators are willing to explore different ways to evaluate what students know beyond just the knowledge-based answer. I wish you well in the new year.Delete